On another note, it's only BAD to be racist if you're "against" Obama. No need to worry about it when it is reversed, right? (I made mention of this in yesterday's post--though I said I heard about it from Hannity's show). Coworker was kind enough to send me this link to Rush's commentary.
Moonbattery posted a bit about the "racism" that is running rampant in this nation. "The conceit of this is that all of us who are protesting now would be perfectly content with radical socialism and trillion dollar deficits if a white president were ramming them down our throats."
INSIGHTFUL Coworker: "I had an epiphany this morning as I was driving in… Obama is trying to get all of his extreme agendas passed now, prior to 2010 elections, while he has control. Because it’s likely that Dems will lose the majority they have after those elections and he’s willing to be frustrated and “work together” and have a non-controversial 2010-2012 in preparation for reelection. I don’t know it took so long for me to figure this out."
My response? "Well, duh." (I am still a child of the 80s)
Oh--I WAS informed yesterday out on ALa's comments that I was too poor to be a republican. I quote: "SouthernGirl -OMG! You are still talking about my kitchen!If you were that impressed w/my kitchen then I know you can definitely not AFFORD TO BE A REPUBLICAN. I have two sisters that are both nurses that support the bill. My friend, a nurse,also supports it. My neighbor, a GI Dr., supports it as does my brother-in-law, a pediatrician. Maybe you just don't actually know anyone in the healthcare field." 100 points to the first person that can guess who is the author of that quote (and NO cheating).
It's rainy here. And I have to write a paper. Sorry I don't feel insightful or creative today--toodles all you racist, mobsters. Til next time.
1 comments:
We are all too poor to be Republicans. The Democrats have made it so.
Any healthcare provider who supports this legislation is (1)invested in the system, probably at a salary, and deeply dependent on Medicare/Medicaid; (2) too dependent in general to be self-reliant; (3)a Democrat who has no appreciation for liberty; and (4) a fool, pure and simple. I say that with no ill will, but with several specific people in mind. The AMA is now controlled by academics and government-dependent physicians - the remaining ones who can are moving offshore and won't keep up their memberships.
Post a Comment